Skip to content

Publications

Articles, book chapters and reports 

— and Aude Géry, ‘La dimension juridique de la cyberdéfense’, in Didier Danet, Amaël Cattaruzza and Stéphane Taillat (ed.), Manuel de Cyberdéfense(CREC 2018), July 2018, 61-70.

—, ‘Cyberopérations et droit international. De l’opportunité de saisir la Commission du droit international des Nations unies de la question du droit international applicable aux cyberopérations’, Note de Recherche, n°59, IRSEM, 17 July 2018, <https://www.defense.gouv.fr/content/download/537343/9235577/file/NR_IRSEM_n59_2018.pdf>.

— and Aude Géry, ‘Le droit international dans la « Stratégie nationale de la cyberdéfense »’, Note de Recherche, n°58, IRSEM, 11 July 2018, <https://www.defense.gouv.fr/content/download/536833/9229632/file/NR%20IRSEM%2058%20-%20Delerue%20-%20Droit%20international.pdf>.

—, ‘The Codification of the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations: A Matter for the ILC?’ (2018), 7(4) ESIL Reflections, <https://esil-sedi.eu/?p=12815>.

—, ‘Stratégie juridique pour la cyberdéfense française (2018), 30 Champs de Marssupplément, 297-306,<https://www.cairn.info/revue-les-champs-de-mars-2018-1-page-297.htm>.

—, [book review] ‘Schmitt MN and Vihul L (eds), The Tallinn Manual 2.0 on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations (2nd edn, Cambridge University Press 2017)’ (2018), 30 Champs de Mars, 141-143, <https://www.cairn.info/revue-les-champs-de-mars-2018-1-page-135.htm>.

—, ‘Analyse du Manuel de Tallinn 2.0 sur le droit international applicable aux cyber opérations’ (DGRIS/IRSEM 2017), November 2017.

—, ‘The Right to Respond? States and the Cyber Arena’ (2018), 17(1) Turkish Policy Quarterly<http://turkishpolicy.com/article/888/the-right-to-respond-states-and-the-cyber-arena>.

—, ‘United Nations General Assembly Resolution 70/237 on Developments in the field of information and telecommunications in the context of international security, 30th December 2015 (UN Doc A/RES/70/237), OXIO 236’, Oxford International Organizations, May 2017, <http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law-oxio/e236.013.1/law-oxio-e236>.

—, ‘State Responses to Cyber Operations’, Young Academics Program, Global Relations Forum [Global İlişkiler Forumu], Istanbul, Turkey, July 2017, available online: <http://www.gif.org.tr/files/Young%20Academics%20Papers/state-responses-to-cyber-operations-by-francois-delerue.pdf>.

— & Aude Géry, Etat des lieux et perspectives sur les normes de comportement responsable des Etats et mesures de confiance dans le domaine numérique [Situation and perspectives on the norms of behavior and confidence-building measures in the digital domain], Note Stratégique, CEIS (January 2017), available online: <https://ceis.eu/fr/etat-des-lieux-et-perspectives-sur-les-normes-de-comportement-responsable-des-etats-et-mesures-de-confiance-dans-le-domaine-numerique/>.

—, ‘Civilian direct participation in cyber hostilities’ (October 2014), 19 IDP Revista d’Internet, Dret i Política (Journal of Internet Law and Policy), 3-17, available at http://journals.uoc.edu/index.php/idp/issue/view/n19; first published in: Joan Balcells Padulles, Mònica Vilasau Solana, M. José Pifarré de Moner, Ismael Peña López, Miquel Peguera Poch, Agustí Cerrillo-i-Martínez, Internet, Law and Politics: A decade of transformations(Huygens Editorial, Proceedings of the 10thInternational Conference on Internet, Law & Politics, July 2014) 497-516.

—, ‘La cyberdéfense et la cybersécurité dans le Livre blanc sur la défense et la sécurité nationale de 2013 : une approche ambitieuse et réaliste des cybermenaces’, in Antoine Bondaz (ed.), Eclairages critiques sur le Livre blanc sur la Défense et la Sécurité Nationale de 2013(IHEDN 2014), 53-63.

—, ‘Le statut de l’Union européenne devant l’Assemblée générale après la résolution 65/276 du 10 mai 2011: une nouvelle catégorie d’observateurs ?’, in Denys Simon (ed.), Actualités des relations entre l’Union européenne et l’Organisation des Nations Unies : coopération, tensions, subsidiarité?(Pedone, IREDIES, collection Perspectives internationales, 34, January 2014).

—, ‘The French Twitter Case: a difficult equilibrium between freedom of expression and its limits’ (2013), 10 Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review, 193-197.

Academic blog post

—, & Aude Géry, ‘France’s Cyberdefense Strategic Review and International Law’ (Lawfare, 23 March 2018) available at: <https://www.lawfareblog.com/frances-cyberdefense-strategic-review-and-international-law>.

—, ‘Cyber Operations and the Prohibition of the Threat of Force’ (Opinio Juris, Emerging Voices Symposium, July 2014) available at: <http://opiniojuris.org/2014/07/21/emerging-voices-cyber-operations-prohibition-threat-force/>.

Other publications

—, ‘The French Strategic Review of Cyber Defense’ (ISPI [Istituto per gli Studi di Politica Internazionale], April 2018), available online: <https://www.ispionline.it/it/pubblicazione/french-strategic-review-cyber-defense-20376>.

—, ‘2016- The Year the Veils Over State Offensive Cyber Operations Were Lifted’, in: Cyber World : Rounding up the latest in Cyber Security(Secgate, March 2017), pp. 19-27, available online : <http://secgate.co.uk/magazine/>.

—, ‘La cyberguerre et le droit international’ / ‘Cyberwar und völkerrecht’ [Cyber warfare and international law] (Arte Future, translated in German by Arte, 6 February 2014), available in French <http://future.arte.tv/fr/cyberguerre-et-paix> and in German <http://future.arte.tv/de/cyberwar-and-peace>.